Supreme Court Accepts Case Blaming Lawyer for Bad Insanity Plea Advice
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case in which an inmate convicted of murder claims his lawyer improperly advised him to withdraw an insanity plea.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found the advice violated standards of professional conduct because it was the only affirmative defense, SCOTUSblog reports. The appeals court ordered a new trial for the defendant, Alexandre Mirzayance, even though state court rulings had affirmed the conviction, the Associated Press reports.
The cert petition (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog) asked whether the 9th Circuit exceeded its authority by failing to defer to state court rulings, and whether a federal court can substitute its own factual findings for those of a district court without determining they were clearly erroneous.
SCOTUSblog says the Supreme Court may want to clarify points about the lawyer’s defense, or it may want to consider whether the appeals court properly reconsidered the case after the Supreme Court ordered it remanded in 2007 for another look.
The case is Knowles v. Mirzayance.
