Calif. Court Reconsiders But Doesn’t Change Ford Punitives Verdict
A California appeals court is standing its ground and refusing to change an earlier ruling requiring Ford Motor Co. to pay $82.6 million in a rollover case.
The U.S. Supreme Court had asked the California court to reconsider in light of its ruling in Philip Morris USA v. Williams, the Recorder reports. The February 2007 Supreme Court decision held that jurors could not base a punitive damages award on harm to nonparties, but they could take third-party harm into account when determining the reprehensibility of a defendant’s conduct.
The San Diego’s 4th District Court of Appeal said in a “somewhat surprising” ruling on Monday that there was no risk that jurors had punished Ford for harm to third parties, based on the evidence and arguments presented at trial, the Recorder story says. “Rather, counsel was discussing the repeated nature of Ford’s actions in arguing the reprehensibility of Ford’s conduct,” the opinion (PDF) said. “That argument was entirely proper and did not create a ‘significant risk’ the jury would punish Ford for injuries to third parties.”
The plaintiff in the Ford case, Benetta Buell-Wilson, was paralyzed when she swerved to avoid hitting a metal object and her Ford Explorer rolled over. A jury originally awarded her almost $369 million, but the California appeals courts cut the award to $82.6 million, including $55 million in punitives.
