Legal Ethics

9th Cir. Reverses Judge's $25K Attorney's Fee Sanctions in Winning Discrimination Case

  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Print

A federal appeals court has reversed $25,000 in attorney’s fee sanctions imposed by a judge on a practitioner who won discrimination cases against FedEx, saying that the lawyer should have been given a chance to defend himself and correct errors.

In an unpublished opinion (PDF), the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also said U.S. District Judge Susan Illston was correct to refuse Waukeen McCoy’s $2 million attorney’s fee petition. But the judge may wish to consider before making a final decision on McCoy’s attorney’s fees the effect that denying him reimbursement could have on his clients, reports the Recorder.

McCoy says he has a 40 percent contingency fee agreement that will be paid out of the verdict amount if the prevailing plaintiff isn’t awarded attorney’s fees. He contends that the judge has a “personal vendetta,” the Recorder says.

Illston denied McCoy’s earlier attorney’s fee petition after finding that he didn’t have contemporaneous time records to support his claim for payment.

Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.